Discussion: Is Islam religion of Peace?
Some weeks ago I send a group message addressed to friends and colleagues of mine containing web links to a slide-show posted on Jerusalem Online.
http://www.jerusalemonline.com/terror1.asp
http://www.jerusalemonline.com/terror2.asp
A response from a friend of mine gave a start to a relatively long lasting debate on that topic. It was not originally intended to be posted online and style and language might not be good enough as well as some facts and dates could be provided wrongly, but I thought it would be good idea to get it publicly discussed. The full discussion is in my personal blog. I provide the most interesting part below.
Hi,
In response to your concern about some of us who may have misconceptions about Islam, i would like to share with you this movie (which a good Muslim friend has shared to me in my website).
After you have watched this movie, tell me if any of our notions towards Islam is unfounded and subjective?
Tell me which is the lesser evil: the educated who believes in the existence of radical Islam or the ignorant who believes in radical Islam?
1. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X2D7_DPhDBo&mode=related&search =
2. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ij5jfmEhUHk&mode=related&search =
3. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UCA8ldF0KzU&mode=related&search =
4. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_hFywMAn5k4&NR=1
After watching the movie I have had questions, some of which i will dare to ask you . . . . .
You say there millions of Muslims like you who practice Islam without doing any harm to others. Why don’t i see these millions condemning or making noise about the evil acts of the “few” radical Muslims? Is it fear or tolerance?
Why do the moderate Muslim allow Muslim kids in the East to be reared with hatred towards non-Muslims? I am angered by the fact that kids are being taught in schools about the propaganda of hate. The indoctrination of the youth to a culture of hate is disturbing and i cannot stop myself from getting angry while watching these kids profess their intentions to be suicide warriors! Again, what are the rest of the Muslims doing about this? If Muslims really want the world to know Islam as a religion of peace, start by teaching the kids to play and enjoy their youth and the world.
I have faith in the vast majority of good Muslims, I just wish that they will not allow the minority radical Muslims to prevail and will start breaking their silence and take bigger steps to cure the growing cancer in the same body they share - Islam.
/R
*******
Hi,
First of all let me thank you for those links, I did really like that documentary.
Second of all, I am happy we are moving up to the next (more complicated) stage of the discussion, although I must admit you not really ready to do it, since it requires some historical, political, cultural and theological insight to that topic.
But let me try to answer your questions and I’ll start with the last one which I consider the most important.
What are the rest of the muslims doing about this?
Nothing, almost nothing. In order to answer your question I tried to find evidences of condemnation of Radical Islam (I would use that term instead of Islamic Terrorism) by Muslim World. Although I found several ones, I do believe that it is not enough, since those low voices are not heard by radicals and even if heard not taken into account. I was expecting that at some point you will come up with that question.
Tell me which the lesser evil is: the educated who believes in the existence of radical Islam or the ignorant who believes in radical Islam?
Most probably I did not get your point correctly, but anyways I don’t find educated person admitting the existence of radical Islam as evil, regardless to its extent. Radical Islam does exist! It is evil! But it does not give a right to anyone to generalize and make the rest Muslim world responsible for that.
Why do the moderate Muslims allow Muslim kids in the East to be reared with hatred towards non-Muslims?
The question should sound like “Why does moderate (which is arguable) Muslim in the East allow kids to be reared with hatred ….. ”
A Muslim who allows his child to learn that awful stuff is either absolutely ignorant or not moderate Muslim at all. Thanks to Allah I was not taught to hate other religious, nor my counterparts. So, that is again matter of region (Middle East) which I pointed out at the very beginning. It is very pity that children are being a tool in hands of ignorant and uncivilized people.
The comparison provided in that documentary regarding Hitler Youth and schools in particular countries of Middle East (not all) are also very reasonable. Recalling Nazi regime I would point out that Humanity always creates an evil and then suffers and struggles against it, when it is too late to start struggle and too many lives have gone. You must know that during the first decade of Hitler’s regime The Third Reich was supported by “civilized” nations as a counter balance to Communist threat which was considered to be the biggest evil. Even Czechs were sacrificed by for the sake of what Chamberlain called Peace and only after half of Europe was occupied Major Powers have realized the sad reality.
After Second World War United Nations deiced to create a State of Israel in the territory of a former British colony a part of which is now called Palestinian Occupied Territory - the place inhabited by Arabs for centuries. I am not anti-Semitic but that was a big mistake, at least that should have been carried out in a more well thought-out and cautious way. Unfortunately the humanity got a long lasting (seems like never ending) Arab-Israeli conflict.
In early 1980’s when Soviet Union illegally intervened in Afghan territory (doing the same mistake as US did in Vietnam) the United States were implicitly supporting (mainly through Pakistan) Majaheds providing them with arms. In 1990’s those people called themselves Taliban!!! In 2001 US were fighting against them. Today they are still powerful and controlling a considerable part of Afghanistan.
In late 1990’s Tajikistan has suffered a civil war because of radicals while Uzbekistan and Russia suffered from Terrorist attacks. Chechen terrorists attacking civilians in Russia from 1997 to 2000 were called by western “civilized” nations as rebels fighting for freedom of Chechnya. After series of terrorist attacks in Uzbekistan in 1999 our President coming to Istanbul summit addressed world leaders urging them to fight terrorism, especially UK to eliminate headquarters (!!!) of Hizbut-Takhrir in London. But other’s problems could hardly touch them …
NYC 2001 9/11, … London 2005 , … Madrid - now Islamic Terrorism is problem number 1 globally. But unfortunately Radical Islam is much stronger now than it used to be.
You have to understand that I am not trying to justify, but rather to understand WHY it happened?
It is always difficult to answer the “WHY” question. One must be able to analyze maintain as much objectivity as possible.
And here we are back to your questions -
After you have watched this movie, tell me if any of our notions towards Islam is unfounded and subjective?
That is the main problem, even in that documentary and in many sources “experts” instead of being specific and say Arabs, Radicals, Palestinians, they say just Muslims, they say just Islam. I understand that people watching the same documentary get its plot differently, but I just refer to the same source (I believe part 2) which urges watchers to avoid stereotypes and generalizations.
One of the worst things both Radicals and some non-Muslims do is quoting Quran which arguably calls Muslims to kill. You will find the answer to that problem as well, and then I hope you will understand that while dealing with Muslim, attempts to point out and interpret different suras from Qur’an and argue that his/her religion is not religion of Peace and it is a priori source of terrorism, all of that just create a frustration and sometimes aggression leading to different types of conflicts or at least tension.
If Muslims really want the world to know Islam as a religion of peace, start by teaching the kids to play and enjoy their youth and the world.
This another generalization, probably directed not to me and not to all Muslims, but if yes, it would be very politically incorrect and absolutely unacceptable.
My best regards,
P.S. If you have spare time please look at links below which not only support but also argue my position.
Islam and terrorism
http://islam.about.com/od/terrorism/f/terrorism.htm
http://islam.about.com/od/terrorism/f/terrorism_verse.htm
Is Islam a religion of Peace
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/Pages/AboutSite.htm
Islam and antisemitism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_and_antisemitism
Are Christians and Jews believers according to Qur’an?
http://friendfinder.com/intgroups/gi179/qi87476/acview_thread_message.html
*******
Hi,
I agree that my knowledge on Islam history, its battle-cries, and what not, are limited. However, I take offense from the insinuation that my ineptitude on the subject matter earns me no merit to get angry to what you also agree to be evil and appalling! I am furious to be compared to those who are condemned in the documentary. If it is wrong to get angry because Muslim kids are maltreated, used, tricked and robbed of their youth, then I REFUSE TO BE RIGHT.
“If Muslims really want the world to know Islam as a religion of peace, start by teaching the kids to play and enjoy their youth and the world. -
This is another generalization, probably directed not to me and not to all Muslims, but if yes, it would be very politically incorrect and absolutely unacceptable”
The question is intended for all Muslims and is NOT politically incorrect because it was stated in the context of the fact that Muslim Kids in East are deceived and misled. It is NOT an attack to Islam as a religion NOR an offensive remark against Muslims. It is NEVER politically incorect to suggest others to do the right thing - as it is the absolute and obvious. It was NEVER my intention to insult you or Muslims in general.
How much knowledge does one need to distinguish good from bad? How much awareness of the past does one need to be able to have the right to say that taking the lives of others for whatever reason is barbaric? How much understanding of the culture must one attain to earn the voice to question, if not condemn, the indifference of people who say that terrorism is wrong and definitely not Islamic, yet are silent, if not hesitant to speak out?
But then again, my questions are not sound because I have yet to understand the history and the roots of the problem despite the common knowledge that thousands of lives have already been lost.
The question i asked: “Why do moderate Muslims allow Muslim kids in the East to be reared with hatred towards non-Muslims?” is meant EXACTLY that way. My intention is to address ALL Muslims not just those in the East. I believe it is the responsibility of everyone BUT PRIMARILY of ALL Muslims to address such wrong doing inflicted on Muslim kids.
I find it ridiculous how you conveniently “regionalize” the problem. It is as if you have a pile of shit in your living room and you say your house is not a mess because there are other rooms in the house where others can dwell without smelling the deadly stench.
In one of the links you shared it says that where Muslims are majority, there is a systematic discrimination and oppression of those who practice other faiths - and where Muslims are minority, there is rebellion, terror and disloyalty. But then again, you might say that I must understand history.
You say:
“You have to understand that I am not trying to justify, but rather to understand WHY it happened? It is always difficult to answer the “WHY” question. One must be able to analyze maintain as much objectivity as possible.”
From that same link i quote:
“We cannot continue to think that the solution to the violence is greater understanding and tolerance for Islam, as Muslim apologists often imply when offering rare commentary on high-profile terror attacks. It is the killers and their supporters who need lessons in tolerance and understanding, not their victims.”
Other than the fact that there seem to be no substantial steps taken by the moderate Muslim to address these issues, You missed out one question that i asked: Why don’t i see the millions of moderate Muslims condemning or making noise about the evil acts of the “few” radical Muslims? Is it fear or tolerance? The reason why I asked this is because - in the news you see Muslims in the UK and US rally on streets for equal rights and opportunity and other petty issues. However, I have never seen them publicly denounce the terrorist acts of the radical Muslims. Is fear to be branded heretic or traitor to Islam? or Is it indifference?
“Usually when people are sad, they don’t do anything. They just cry over their condition. But when they get angry, they bring about a change.” - Malcolm X
If the above quotation were true, I wish we all get angry and bring about change! But then again, history should tell us.
With my limited knowledge, i have contemplated that unless we see Muslims rise above their own biases and speak out to condemn the criminal acts of their brothers who have gone astrayed, unless we see them combating and eradicating the misinterpretation of their religion, the conflict will remain and sadly will worsen. But then again, what do i know?
“This is a story about four people named Everybody, Somebody, Anybody, and Nobody. There was an important job to be done and Everybody was sure that Somebody would do it. Anybody could have done it, but Nobody did it. Somebody got angry about that, because it was Everybody’s job. Everybody thought Anybody could do it, but Nobody realized that Everybody wouldn’t do it. It ended up that Everybody blamed Somebody when Nobody did what Anyone could have.” Unknown Author
These four people need not study history to get the job done. They should have simply done the obvious. To put things candidly, even shoes know the answer - NIKE’s tag line: JUST DO IT!
Peace,
/R
*******
Hi,
Too pity you have ignored my argument on Western Worlds implicit support of terrorism before 9/11 (Chechen Islamic Radicals invited to US Congress and State Department for “talks”, Hizbut-Takhrir office functioning openly in UK for many years while that organization was exploding people in Central Asia killing Mulsims), on the other hand making Muslims around the World responsible and even guilty for non-adequate reaction.
You know, I am the person who treats people regardless their nationality, religion, sexual orientation and political views. And I would use the same approach in discussing that problems. We all HUMAN BEINGS are touched by any act against HUMANITY - Muslims, Christians, Jews, Buddhists and etc.
I believe it is the responsibility of everyone BUT PRIMARILY of ALL Muslims to address such wrong doing inflicted on Muslim kids.
WHY??? Why primarily Muslims all of over the world should be responsible ??? Because we share common religion with those bastards? We share common thoughts with any radical when we both say “Allahu Akbar”, BUT there is nothing in common between us when he thinks that he must kill people because Qur’an says so. (I hope you know now what Qur’an says about that if you looked at all links, not only those quoted). So, if I don’t share that believe with Ahmed from Palestine, why do I have to be responsible more than Fernando from Philippines? Why do I have to do more then he does?
You know I am equally concerned about those kids in Middle East and kids in the US killing each other in high schools continuously. I am equally concerned about terrorist acts committed by radical Muslims in London and Madrid and the same destructive acts committed in UK and Spain by Irish Republican Army and Basks Organizations. Because I consider Arab and American kids equally innocent, I consider crimes done by Irish and Basks and Arabs equally terrible.
*******
Hi,
This is not about you as a person or your personal convictions. Keep that in mind as we discuss.
You asked WHY Muslims should be primarily responsible? The answer is simple: because Muslims are in better position to explain to their fellow Muslims what Islam faith is all about. No one else! Certainly, a is in no position to tell you or any other Muslim to do more. But what should an ordinary man who has limited understanding of the faith of Islam do but to encourage Muslims to take bolder steps and work hand-in-hand with other faithful to abolish this crime against humanity? Is it wrong for anyone to suggest that?
I did not ignore your argument on the “implicit” support of US and UK to terrorism. I didn’t dwell on that topic because, again, you are trying to shift the blame to others instead of focusing on what Muslims could have done given their strong belief about how the US and UK governments infuse money and arms to support these radical groups? Instead, I wanted you to realize that what most Muslims want us to do is to understand the bigger picture and stop blaming them solely for the crimes; that there are other parties involve who are equally to be blamed; that there are historical viewpoints and political agenda to consider. And then what? What will Muslims do?
For the third time I will be asking this question in the hope of getting a proper response from you:
“Other than the fact that there seem to be no substantial steps taken by the moderate Muslim to address these issues, You missed out one question that i asked: Why don’t i see the millions of moderate Muslims condemning or making noise about the evil acts of the “few” radical Muslims? Is it fear or tolerance? The reason why i asked this is because - in the news you see Muslims in the UK and US rally on streets for equal rights and opportunity and other petty issues. However, i have never seen them publicly denounce the terrorist acts of the radical Muslims. Is fear to be branded heretic or traitor to Islam? or Is it indifference? ”
____________________________________________________________
I must confess I do not know the answer to that question. May be some of you will be willing to share you thoughts on that topic ….











on July 18th, 2007 at 9:49 pm
This still bugs me. 9/11/2001, Pentagon. Where is the Boeing 757-sized hole? In fact, where is the Boeing 757? -
http://i19.tinypic.com/4t7idnb.png
on July 19th, 2007 at 6:41 pm
This being said, what some dub ‘terrorism’ is in several cases, in fact, justified resistance.
on July 19th, 2007 at 9:27 pm
To pick in on the main question — whether Islam is a religion of peace — I must say I find it rather ambiguous. In terms of war-mongering and making victims, over the last century or so, by far the worst has not been Islam but very areligious/secular systems and groups (nationalism, European Fascism, Stalinism).
Islam, I think, wants peace where and if possible. But it takes into account that reality can be different. That whether one likes it or not, life, nature and history have violent sides and phases. They are a constant struggle: for survival; and between the forces of darkness who are prevalent in today’s world and the forces of life. And it is ever more going to be that way until world chaos destroys the very decadent, evil order that set it into motion.
Who says struggle in Islam says Jihad, which is what it means (’struggle’ or ‘effort’ in Arabic). As many fo you may know, there are basically two forms of Jihad in Islam:
1. the Internal Jihad (aka ‘Jihad al Aqbar’ or greater Jihad) which is basically one’s spiritual and intellectual development;
2. the Physical Jihad (a.k.a. ‘Jihad al Asgar’ or lesser Jihad) which often takes violent forms (even if violence if not the only form of lesser Jihad) and is justified in several cases, eg.: agression against Muslims and Islam; blatant injustice; oppression of Muslims by non-Muslims or their vassal rulers; etc.
Sometimes you have to be realist and see what enemy you face. Is violence againt the karimovist tiranny in Uzb and those who support it, for example, wrong? I don’t think so, for the enemy is thoroughly evil and depraved and only understand the logics of violence and oppression. Also, in Uzb, several conditions for lesser Jihad are present.
Also, in what perspective do you place Islamic violence? What about the rage caused by the double standards that feed the violence?
On July 15, 1099, European Crusaders massacred about 70,000 inhabitants (most of them Muslims) of Al Quds/Jerusalem. And since the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan thousands of Muslim civilians (eg. between 3,700 and 5,000 in Afg since 2001; and 12,000 in 2005 and first half of 2006 in Iraq) have died either directly, as ‘collateral damage’ or indirectly. By contrast, the number of Westerners killed on 9/11 (the event that triggered the Agh and Iraq invasions) was 3,000. As long as that is the ‘exchange rate’, hatred will flourish.
This is not a question about one justifying the other. It’s about putting things in context.
on July 19th, 2007 at 10:55 pm
Ataman Rakin, Jihad was also a term in Arabic world of 1970s for political reforms, a jihad for social welfare, family policies and etc.
All religions are about peace, and none about violence.
on July 20th, 2007 at 7:50 am
Ataman Rakin, you said “Is violence againt the karimovist tiranny in Uzb and those who support it, for example, wrong? I don’t think so, for the enemy is thoroughly evil and depraved and only understand the logics of violence and oppression.”
While the principle of this statement might be debatable, I think it can draw us into a good example of how this kind of thinking can be dangerous. The problem with many violent revolutions / struggles / insurgencies / coups / etc. is that often times the initial principles of the revolution are eventually replaced by those more extreme than what the original leaders intended. Sometimes those original leaders are disposed of to make way for the ‘real’ revolutionaries who implement a more severe form of their ideal.
Did the original leaders of the French revolution expect the Terror? Or in China, Cambodia, or Russia? I doubt if anyone thought that at the beginning of things that they would eventually cause the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people.
Those revolutions were fixated on an ideal: communism, socialism, maoism, etc. The violence caused by them tarnished those ideals… but those ideals generally didn’t last more than a few decades and didn’t span more than a few countries.
But what happens when you base your revolutionary zeal on a vast, thousand year old religion? What happens when that revolution inevitably gets pulled by its more extreme members and things get a lot more bloody than people imagined? It ends up tarnishing an entire religion… and all 1.2 billion people that belong to it.
This is one reason why I don’t think it would ever be a good idea to drive a revolution based on Islam (or any religion).
on July 21st, 2007 at 9:45 pm
“Jihad was also a term in Arabic world of 1970s for political reforms, a jihad for social welfare, family policies and etc.
Do you mean the (in the meantime completely discredited) Arab socialist movements like Nasserism, Baathism, Fatah, … who sometimes threw in Islamic lingo to mobilise the poeople?
As for Jihad, I clearly said that “the Physical Jihad (…) which often takes violent forms (even if violence if NOT THE ONLY FORM OF LESSER JIHAD)”. In fact the main Jihad is to let Islam play its role as a values and norms framework and as a catalyst for social welfare initiatives, i.e. ’social Islam’ as I advocate it already since a long time on this and other forums.
“All religions are about peace, and none about violence.”
Yes, Jamiat. They are and so does Islam. But at the same time Islam takes into account that not everyone wants peace that evil lurks in many forms, and that one must be prepared to fight if necessary instead of turning the other cheek like the Christian slave morals preach.
“is one reason why I don’t think it would ever be a good idea to drive a revolution based on Islam (or any religion).”
As I said on other occasions, I am 500% opposed to an Islamic state. And I do not believe that an overthrow of the Uzbek regime will be led by an Islamic movement even if many Uzbeks want be and to live more like Muslims. You can be inspired by Islam without wanting an Islamic state à la Iran or Sudan under Al Turabi. Once the Karimovs, their cronies and all these IFI consultants are done with, Muslim faith-based groups will play their social role at least in some parts of teh country and some segments of Uzbek society. But that is not necessarily bad. We have seenwhat ‘alternative’ the West and all these IFIs had to offer after all.
Other than that, Brian, how would you deal with the karimovites then? Maybe organise another seminar or government-civil society dialogue (with a gender dimension of course)?
lol
on July 22nd, 2007 at 7:46 am
I’m not saying that I’m necessarily against the overthrow of the Karimov regime, I’m just saying that if there was some kind of overthrow then having the pretexts of the revolution founded on Islam is really dangerous for many reasons, including the one I mentioned above.
For instance, let’s say (just an example) you lead a revolution, openly inspired by Islam but against an Islamic state. Like many revolutions things get real messy and don’t go according to plan. Don’t you think there would be a serious risk that the original plan could get hijacked by people who feel more extreme than you?
Demagoguery is real popular everywhere: in WWII it was really easy to blame innocent Japanese civilians and have them locked up in America. It’s scary how easy it is for extreme viewpoints to rise to the surface when you stir the pot. That’s why I say that basing any kind of violent act on religion is opening a can of worms.
on July 30th, 2007 at 3:40 pm
“Don’t you think there would be a serious risk that the original plan could get hijacked by people who feel more extreme than you?”
No doubt the fall of the Karimovs¨*will* turn nasty and bloody well beyond the the positive possibilities opened up by it. There will be killings, stand-by executions and lynchings. I mean, that will by far not be as extreme as in Iraq or certain African states but still. Yet that will not be because of ‘Islamist extremists’ who have (no matter what Starr/Akiner-like bozos pretend) no social base or real capacity in Uzb. That will be because there is too much cropped-up hatred and frustration, and because of the brutalisation and bestialisation of Uzb society under/by the Karimovs. It’s a phase one will have to go through/sweat out, like a flu or diarreah.
Allah biz menen!