Comments on: Money Talks http://uzbekistan.neweurasia.net/2006/03/26/money-talks/ Open discussion about current issues in Uzbekistan Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:13:15 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3 By: www.neweurasia.net - Blogging Central Asia and the Caucasus » Blog Archive » Uzbekistan: Targeted assistance http://uzbekistan.neweurasia.net/2006/03/26/money-talks/#comment-346 www.neweurasia.net - Blogging Central Asia and the Caucasus » Blog Archive » Uzbekistan: Targeted assistance Tue, 28 Mar 2006 10:02:42 +0000 http://uzbekistan.neweurasia.net/2006/03/26/money-talks/#comment-346 [...] Nick notes that not only the World Bank seems to have changed its lending stance towards Uzbekistan, but also the Asian Development Bank. [...] […] Nick notes that not only the World Bank seems to have changed its lending stance towards Uzbekistan, but also the Asian Development Bank. […]

]]> By: Jack http://uzbekistan.neweurasia.net/2006/03/26/money-talks/#comment-337 Jack Sun, 26 Mar 2006 13:19:11 +0000 http://uzbekistan.neweurasia.net/2006/03/26/money-talks/#comment-337 Hi, I advise you to see this. http://www.worldbank.org.uz/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/COUNTRIES/ECAEXT/UZBEKISTANEXTN/0,,contentMDK:20855428~menuPK:294193~pagePK:141137~piPK:141127~theSitePK:294188,00.html It said World Bank has problems with its resources, not corruption in Uzbekistan or fear that credits will be used untarget. I want also note that Uzbekistan gets loans/credits, which should be rapayed at some time and the country officials are not interested to waste funds. They try to use them carefully, even too carefully, to achieve effectiveness. Besides, it was clear in May 2005 that some countries will loss fundings from World Bank after new president of the bank was appointed. Not only Uzbekistan lost fundings, but some more countries, who is against the US policy. Paul Wolfowitz is man of the US and he will work with Bush administration to close fundings to those who is against them. I think World Bank and other international financial institution do not really assist countries, but they try to destroy economies. Hi,

I advise you to see this. http://www.worldbank.org.uz/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/COUNTRIES/ECAEXT/UZBEKISTANEXTN/0,,contentMDK:20855428~menuPK:294193~pagePK:141137~piPK:141127~theSitePK:294188,00.html

It said World Bank has problems with its resources, not corruption in Uzbekistan or fear that credits will be used untarget.

I want also note that Uzbekistan gets loans/credits, which should be rapayed at some time and the country officials are not interested to waste funds. They try to use them carefully, even too carefully, to achieve effectiveness.

Besides, it was clear in May 2005 that some countries will loss fundings from World Bank after new president of the bank was appointed. Not only Uzbekistan lost fundings, but some more countries, who is against the US policy.

Paul Wolfowitz is man of the US and he will work with Bush administration to close fundings to those who is against them.

I think World Bank and other international financial institution do not really assist countries, but they try to destroy economies.

]]>